🔐 Private Route in React Router v6
Things are changing fast in WEB today, and react-router v6 is in beta already and around the corner. 🤔
This is just for learning purposes only, react-router v6 is still in beta, use at your own risk
Private routes in v5 and below were done in a specific way using a custom component mostly named PrivateRoute that was most of the times just a wrapper and composition of basic Route and Redirect e.g.
function PrivateRoute(props) {
let { component: Component, children, render, ...rest } = props;
let auth = useAuth();
return (
<Route
{...rest}
render={() => (auth ? <Component /> : <Redirect to="/login" />)}
/>
);
}
function App() {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Route path="/" component={Public} />
<PrivateRoute path="/private" component={Private} />
</BrowserRouter>
);
}
But taking a look at v6 docs it seems that things changed a little bit, and we need to think a little bit different about it.
For info about all API reference see the link
Let’s move on.
Some things that we used to create PrivateRoute have changed a little bit
Redirectis nowNavigateRouteprops changed and is just a stub component now- A new component
Routesappearead
In v6, routes are rendered in such a manner
function App() {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Routes>
<Route path="/" element={<Public />} />
<Route path="/private" element={<Private />} />
</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>
);
}
const Public = () => <div>public</div>;
const Private = () => <div>private</div>;
So as you can see, no more render props or component prop. You need to pass a direct JSX element (don’t worry about performance if you do)
Ok now let’s take a look at Route component source code
/**
* Declares an element that should be rendered at a certain URL path.
*
* @see https://reactrouter.com/api/Route
*/
export function Route(_props: RouteProps): React.ReactElement | null {
invariant(
false,
`A <Route> is only ever to be used as the child of <Routes> element, ` +
`never rendered directly. Please wrap your <Route> in a <Routes>.`,
);
}

Wait a minute where is the code? 👀 Well actually the parent component Routes will use the Route just as a host for the props and children, and do nothing more with the Route
For more info about
Routesimplementation see link
So how we do implement our PrivateRoute now? 🤔 If we do some adjustments to PrivateRoute props, it will look like this
function App() {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Routes>
<Route path="/" element={<Public />} />
<PrivateRoute path="/private" element={<Private />} />
</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>
);
}
But this will not work. Routes will just take the props of PrivateRoute and ignore it’s body totally. Even a console.log inside PrivateRoute will not be shown.
So what we do? 🤔 We do some more adjustments to PrivateRoute
function PrivateRoute({ children }) {
const auth = useAuth();
return auth ? <>{children}</> : <Navigate to="/login" />;
}
As you can see we changed Redirect to Navigate, and just return children if user is authenticated. And the usage of it also changes a little bit
function App() {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Routes>
<Route path="/" element={<Public />} />
<Route
path="/private"
element={
<PrivateRoute>
<Private />
</PrivateRoute>
}
/>
</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>
);
}
As you can see PrivateRoute also moves to element prop.
The implementation of
PrivateRoutecan be done in multiple ways.
Here is a different implementation of PrivateRoute using Outlet
function PrivateOutlet() {
const auth = useAuth();
return auth ? <Outlet /> : <Navigate to="/login" />;
}
function App() {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Routes>
<Route path="/private-outlet" element={<PrivateOutlet />}>
<Route element={<Private />} />
</Route>
</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>
);
}
The pros of this is that you can put multiple private sub routes under same route.
For a full example see this Codesandbox
That’s all for today. Happy coding! 🎉 🎊 ✨
Keep your users secure!

- Created At
- 9/21/2021
- Updated At
- 3/10/2023
- Published At
- 9/21/2021